Alfa Marushima Tokyo Japan

Uncategorized

Multiple high-grade gold intercepts confirm 1km mineralised trend at Rockland

Dundas Minerals Limited (ASX: DUN) (“Dundas Minerals”, “Dundas” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce highly encouraging 1 metre sample assay results from its recently completed drilling campaign within granted Mining Lease M 24/974 (‘’Rockland’’), at the Windanya Gold Project.


Highlights

  • High grade gold assays from individual 1 metre samples include:
    • 6m @ 3.3g/t gold from 78m, including 1m @7.5g/t from 78m, 1m @7.1g/t from 83m (24RKRC005)
    • 5m @ 2.3g/t gold from 109m, including 1m @8.1g/t from 113m (24RKRC013)
    • 2m @ 5.6g/t gold from 74m, including 1m @9.4g/t from 74m (24RKRC015)
    • 2m @ 2.8g/t gold from 130m, including 1m @5.2g/t from 130m (24RKRC022)
    • 1m @14.9g/t gold from 80m (24RKRC015)
    • 9m @ 1.4g/t gold from 69m (24RKRC012)
    • 5m @ 1.4g/t gold from 65m (24RKRC019)
  • Assay results indicate a new gold mineralised zone within the Rockland ML at the Windanya Gold Project
  • An approximate 1km long trend of significant gold mineralisation
  • Detailed three dimensional modelling of these latest results is in progress, and will provide the foundation to plan follow-up drilling
  • Assay results from recently completed RC drilling at the Baden-Powell Gold Project are expected within two weeks

Dundas is actively exploring for gold at the Windanya and Baden- Powell gold projects, located adjacent to the Goldfields Highway ~60km north of Kalgoorlie, Western Australia, and ~15km north of the Paddington gold mill.

Assay results from 1 metre sample intervals – Rockland

On 12 December 2024, Dundas Minerals announced the discovery of a new 1 km zone of gold mineralisation from its maiden RC drilling program at Rockland, based on assay results from 4 metre composite samples. Subsequently, individual 1 metre samples relating to the mineralised portions of drill holes were submitted for assay.

Results from these assays highlighted multiple intercepts of high grade gold mineralisation at Rockland, with several gold grades significantly higher than the initial composite samples.

Of the 1 metre samples that were submitted, twenty returned gold assays of greater than 2g/t (Table 1), and 67 samples returned gold assays of between 0.5g/t and 2g/t. Significant gold assay results (above 1 gram per tonne) are provided in Appendix 1.

Importantly, these latest assay results confirms the approximate 1km long trend of significant gold mineralisation at Rockland, and indicates a new gold mineralised zone located between the historic Milford and Windanya North prospects. The mineralisation spans the entire length of the granted Mining Lease, and potentially extends north to the Aquarius gold deposit.

Mineralisation comprises an oxide supergene zone in the deeply weathered mafic host lithologies, above a series of stacked structures interpreted to dip shallowly to moderately to the east in the transitional to fresh rock. As illustrated in Figure 1, gold mineralisation is interpreted as trending north – south, which is consistent with the regional trend.

Detailed three dimensional modelling of these latest results is in progress to assess the orientation of mineralisation in fresh rock (below the oxide zone) and will provide the foundation to plan follow-up drilling.

Commenting on the one metre gold assays from the Rockland drilling, Dundas managing director Shane Volk said:

‘’As indicated by the assay results from the initial 4-metre composite samples, results from these 1- metre samples confirm the presence of wide-spread gold mineralisation within the granted Rockland Mining Lease. In many instances the mineralisation is at relatively shallow depth (100 metres or less), with some very nice high grade results returned in several holes – up to 14.9 grams per tonne.’’

‘’Three dimensional modelling of these latest results is in progress. The latest drilling results, combined with available historical drill data within the lease will enable us to make an updated interpretation of the mineralisation trend and develop an exploration model to assist with the planning of further exploration both within the highly prospective M 24/974 and the broader Windanya Gold Project area.’’


Table 1: Gold Assay Results of 2g/t of greater: Rockland 1m samples

Background: Rockland Mining Lease

On 8 October 2024, Dundas Minerals announced that it had executed an exclusive 12-month option to acquire 100% of granted mining lease (ML) M24/974 (Rockland).

Rockland is strategically situated between the Aquarius and Scorpio gold prosects (Figure 1), where on 6 February 2024, Dundas announced high grade gold intercepts from an initial drilling program, including: Aquarius (3m @ 10.2 g/t from 109m; 2m @ 6.5g/t from 70m); and Scorpio (2m@ 3.2 g/t from 9m; 1m @ 6.5g/t from 49m).

The area comprising the Rockland ML has been subject to historic shallow drilling during the 1980s, which was mostly to a maximum depth of 50m (RAB). Also, a series of RAB holes to a maximum depth of ~90m was drilled in the early 2000s, plus 12 RC holes at the Windanya North prospect. More recently the current tenement owner drilled 3 RC holes at depths between 140m and 173m, also at Windanya North. However, the drilling recently completed by Dundas Minerals is the first to systematically test for gold mineralisation at Rockland to depths beyond 50m.

Click here for the full ASX Release

This article includes content from Dundas Minerals, licensed for the purpose of publishing on Investing News Australia. This article does not constitute financial product advice. It is your responsibility to perform proper due diligence before acting upon any information provided here. Please refer to our full disclaimer here.

Quarterly Activities and Cashflow Report for the period ending 31 December 2024

Boab Metals Limited (ASX: BML) (“Boab” or “Company”) is pleased to provide the following activities and cashflow report for the quarter ending 31 December, 2024. During the quarter, the Company continued progressing its flagship Sorby Hills Lead-Silver-Zinc Project (“Sorby Hills” or “the Project”), located in the Kimberley Region of Western Australia.


HIGHLIGHTS

  • Binding US$30 million Prepayment Terms Sheet and associated Offtake Agreement executed between Boab’s 100% subsidiary Sorby Hills Pty Ltd and global commodities trader Trafigura.

Prepayment Terms Sheet – Key Terms

    • US$30 million Prepayment Facility from Trafigura to be applied towards the construction and development of the Project.
    • Interest Rate of SOFR + 5% per annum.
    • 5-year Term from first drawdown with an 18-month interest-only period.

Offtake Agreement – Key Terms

    • 75% of lead-silver concentrate from Sorby Hills for a minimum of 531,000 tonnes.
    • If Boab obtains alternative financing to the Prepayment, the Offtake volume will revert to 50% (or greater, at Boab’s discretion) for a minimum 354,000 tonnes.
    • If Financial Close is not achieved on the Prepayment, the Offtake volume will revert to 25% (or greater, at Boab’s discretion) for a minimum 177,000 tonnes.
  • WA Government consented to key amendments for Sorby Hills required under Part IV of Western Australia’s Environmental Protection
  • Boab continues to progress opportunities to further reduce capital and operating costs.
  • Targeted Final Investment Decision in 2H 2025.
  • The Company had a cash balance of approximately A$3.5M as at 31 December, 2024.
Boab Managing Director and CEO, Simon Noon, stated:

“The December quarter of 2024 saw significant project execution milestones achieved. The binding Prepayment and Offtake agreement with Trafigura is highly favourable for Boab and is the result of a thorough offtake process that demonstrated the attractiveness of the Sorby Hills concentrate. The EPA amendments provide Boab with scope to implement the Sorby Hills Project in line with the Project’s FEED study, including an increase to the open pit depth and mining production rate. We look forward to building upon these milestones and the momentum that we have generated over the past six months to advance Sorby Hills to a Final Investment Decision in 2025.”

Background Information

Sorby Hills is located 50km from the regional centre of Kununurra in the East Kimberley of Western Australia and has access to existing sealed roads to transport the concentrate 150km from the site to the facilities at Wyndham Port. The Project comprises a Mineral Resource of 47.3Mt containing

1.5Mt Pb at 3.1% and 53Moz silver at 35g/t (Table 1). The current Sorby Hills mine plan comprises 18.3Mt at 3.4% Pb and 39g/t Ag of which ~83% is classified as an Ore Reserve (Table 2).

On 6 June 2024, Boab released the results of a Front-End Engineering & Design Study (“FEED Study”) on the Project showing strong pre-tax economics including C1 operating costs of US$0.36/lb payable Pb (incl. a net silver credit of US$0.37/lb payable Pb), NPV8 of A$411M, IRR of 37%, A$778M free cash flow, and an average annualised EBITDA of A$126M. Pre-production capital costs were estimated to be A$264M.

With operating costs covered by revenue generated by a historically non-volatile lead price, the Project free cash flow is exposed to movements in the price of silver.

The Company currently owns 75% of the Project and has executed an agreement to acquire the remaining 25% of the Project upon a Final Investment Decision (ASX release 23 September 2024).

Binding Offtake and Prepayment Agreement

During the quarter, Boab (via its 100% own subsidiary Sorby Hills Pty Ltd (“SHPL”) executed a binding Offtake Agreement and associated US$30 million Prepayment with global commodities trader, Trafigura (ASX release 10 December 2024).

The Prepayment terms include a 5-year term, an interest rate margin of SOFR1 + 5%, and an 18- month interest-free period after which repayments will be paid via equal monthly instalments. Financial Close and drawdown of the Prepayment are subject to, amongst other things, the execution of full-form documentation, the finalisation of outstanding due diligence, and the Project being fully-funded.

Base offtake terms are for 75% of the Sorby Hills Lead-Silver concentrate up to a minimum of 531,000 tonnes (~7 years based on the FEED Study production schedule) with market standard metal payabilities, metal pricing based on spot pricing and a lead treatment charge linked to the quoted annual benchmark. Should Boab utilise alternative financing to the Prepayment or not reach financial close on the Prepayment, Boab shall have the discretion to reduce the offtake volumes to 50% and 25% respectively. In each case, lead treatment charges will revert to an average of the prevailing annual benchmark and the spot lead treatment charge.

The agreements are the result of a highly competitive process including other global traders and smelters that demonstrated the attractiveness of the Sorby Hills concentrate product and represent a key milestone towards a final investment decision on Sorby Hills and a cornerstone of Boab’s financing solution for the Project.

Click here for the full ASX Release

This article includes content from Boab Metals Limited, licensed for the purpose of publishing on Investing News Australia. This article does not constitute financial product advice. It is your responsibility to perform proper due diligence before acting upon any information provided here. Please refer to our full disclaimer here.

Will Trump Bring Back the Gold Standard?

The gold standard hasn’t been used in the US since the 1970s, but when Donald Trump was president from 2017 to 2021 there was some speculation that he could bring it back.

Rumors that the gold standard could be reinstated during Trump’s presidency centered largely on positive comments he made about the idea. Notably, he suggested that it would be “wonderful” to bring back the gold standard, and a number of his advisors were of the same mind — Judy Shelton, John Allison and others supported the concept.

Now that Trump is back in the White House, some are again wondering if he will return the country to the gold standard. Speaking on his War Room podcast back in December 2023, Steve Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist, said he believes the president could ditch the US Federal Reserve and bring back the gold standard in his second term in office.


More recently, the Heritage Foundation included a whole chapter on the Fed written by a former member of Trump’s 2016 transition team in its Project 2025 (a proposed blueprint for Trump’s second term), and suggested a return to the gold standard. While Trump has publicly disavowed Project 2025, its creators say he is privately supportive of the initiative.

Read on to learn what the gold standard is, why it ended, what Trump has said about bringing back the gold standard — and what could happen if a gold-backed currency ever comes into play again.

What is the gold standard?

What is the gold standard and how does it work? Put simply, the gold standard is a monetary system in which the value of a country’s currency is directly linked to the yellow metal. Countries using the gold standard set a fixed price at which to buy and sell gold to determine the value of the nation’s currency.

For example, if the US went back to the gold standard and set the price of gold at US$500 per ounce, the value of the dollar would be 1/500th of an ounce of gold. This would offer reliable price stability.

Under the gold standard, transactions no longer have to be done with heavy gold bullion or gold coins. The gold standard also increases the trust needed for successful global trade — the idea is that paper currency has value that is tied to something real. The goal is to prevent inflation as well as deflation, and to help promote a stable monetary environment.

When was the gold standard introduced?

The gold standard was first introduced in Germany in 1871, and by 1900 most developed nations, including the US, were using it. The system remained popular for decades, with governments worldwide working together to make it successful, but when World War I broke out it became difficult to maintain. Changing political alliances, higher debt and other factors led to a widespread lack of confidence in the gold standard.

​What countries are on the gold standard today?

Currently, no countries use the gold standard. Decades ago, governments abandoned the gold standard in favor of fiat monetary systems. However, countries around the world do still hold gold reserves in their central banks. The Fed is the central bank of the US, and as of January 2025 its gold reserves came to 8,133.46 metric tons.

​Why was the gold standard abandoned?

The demise of the gold standard began as World War II was ending. At this time, the leading western powers met to develop the Bretton Woods agreement, which became the framework for the global currency markets until 1971.

The Bretton Woods agreement was born at the UN Monetary and Financial Conference, held in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, in July 1944. Currencies were pegged to the price of gold, and the US dollar was seen as a reserve currency linked to the price of gold. This meant all national currencies were valued in relation to the US dollar since it had become the dominant reserve currency. Despite efforts from governments at the time, the Bretton Woods agreement led to overvaluation of the US dollar, which caused concerns over exchange rates and their ties to the price of gold.

By 1971, US President Richard Nixon had called for a temporary suspension of the dollar’s convertibility. Countries were then free to choose any exchange agreement, except the price of gold. In 1973, foreign governments let currencies float; this put an end to Bretton Woods, and the gold standard was ousted.

What is the US dollar backed by?

Since the 1970s, most countries have run on a system of fiat money, which is government-issued money that is not backed by a commodity. The US dollar is fiat money, which means it is backed by the government, but not by any physical asset.

The value of money is set by supply and demand for paper money, as well as supply and demand for other goods and services in the economy. The prices for those goods and services, including gold and silver, can fluctuate based on market conditions.

What has Trump said about the gold standard?

While it’s perhaps not common knowledge, Trump has long been a fan of gold.

In fact, as Sean Williams of the Motley Fool has pointed out, Trump has been interested in gold since at least the 1970s, when private ownership of gold bullion became legal again. He reportedly invested in gold aggressively at that time, buying the precious metal at about US$185 and selling it between US$780 and US$790.

Since then, Trump has specifically praised the gold standard. In an oft-quoted 2015 GQ interview that covers topics from marijuana to man buns, Trump said, “Bringing back the gold standard would be very hard to do, but boy, would it be wonderful. We’d have a standard on which to base our money.”

In a separate interview that year, he said, “We used to have a very, very solid country because it was based on a gold standard.”

According to Politico’s Danny Vinik, “(Trump has) surrounded himself with a number of advisors who hold extreme, even fringe ideas about monetary policy. … At least six … have spoken favorably about the gold standard.” Shelton and Allison, mentioned above, are not alone. Others include Ben Carson and David Malpass. The last two, Rebekah and Robert Mercer, eventually distanced themselves from Trump, but had a strong influence before that.

Emphasizing how unusual Trump’s support for the international gold standard is, Joseph Gagnon, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told the news outlet, “(It) seems like nothing that’s happened since the Great Depression.” Gagnon, who has also worked for the Fed, added, “You have to go back to Herbert Hoover.”

Back in 2017, Politico also quoted libertarian Ron Paul, another gold standard supporter, as saying, “We’re in a better position than we’ve ever been in my lifetime as far as talking about serious changes to the monetary system and talking about gold.”

Would it be feasible for the US to return to the gold standard?  

Trump’s first term as president passed without a return to the gold standard, and the consensus seems to be that it’s highly unlikely that this event will come to pass — even with him at the helm once again.

Even many ardent supporters of the system recognize that going back to it could create trouble.

As per the Motley Fool’s Williams, economists largely agree that moving to a lower-key version of the gold standard in 1933 was “a big reason why the US emerged from the Great Depression,” and a return would be a mistake.

But if Trump or a future president did decide to go through with it, what would it take?

According to Kimberly Amadeo at the Balance, due to trade, money supply and the global economy, the rest of the world would need to go back to the gold standard as well. Why? Because otherwise the countries that use the US dollar could stand with their hands out asking for their dollars to be exchanged for gold — including debtors like China and Japan, to which the US owes a large chunk of its multitrillion-dollar national debt.

​Is there enough gold to return to the gold standard?

The fact that the US doesn’t have enough gold in its reserves to pay back all its debt poses a huge roadblock to returning to the gold standard. The country would have to exponentially replenish its gold reserves in advance of any return to the gold standard.

“The United States holds around 261.5 million troy ounces of gold, valued at approximately $489 billion. The total US money supply exceeds $20 trillion, necessitating about 272,430 metric tons of gold at current market prices,” explained Ron Dewitt, Director of Business Development at the Gold Information Network, in a June 2024 LinkedIn post.

“The supply remains insufficient, even including global gold stocks, which total around 212,582 metric tons.”

In addition, it’s understood that returning to the gold standard would require the price of gold to be set much higher than it is currently. What would the price of gold need to be worth if the US returned to the gold standard? Financial analyst and investment banker Jim Rickards has calculated the gold price would need to jump up to at least US$27,000 an ounce.

That means the US dollar would be severely devalued, causing inflation, and since global trade uses the US dollar as a reserve currency, it would grind to a halt. Conversely, returning to the gold standard at a low gold price would cause deflation.

What would silver be worth if the US returned to the gold standard? It’s not a guarantee that silver would follow in gold’s footsteps if a gold standard was re-established due to its many industrial and technological applications. While silver has a long history as a precious metal and played an important role as currency for much of human history, its value today is intrinsically linked to that demand as well.

​What would happen if the US returned to the gold standard?

Returning to the gold standard would have a huge impact on all levels of the US economy and make it impossible for the Fed to offer fiscal stimulus. After all, if the US had to have enough gold reserves to exchange for dollars on an as-needed basis, the Fed’s ability to print paper currency would be incredibly limited.

Supporters believe that could be the perfect way to get the US out of debt, but it could also cause problems during times of economic crisis. It’s important to remember that because 70 percent of the US economy is based on consumer spending, if inflation rose due to the gold price rising, then a lot of consumers would cut spending.

That would then affect the stock market as well, which could very well lead to a recession or worse without the ability of the government to soften that blow via money supply. “Transitioning to a gold standard during an economic crisis would severely limit monetary policy options and could lead to economic instability,” Dewitt warned.

For that reason, a return to the gold standard would also expose the US economy to the yellow metal’s sometimes dramatic fluctuations — while some think that gold would offer greater price stability, it’s no secret that it’s been volatile in the past. Looking back past the metal’s recent stability, it dropped quite steeply from 2011 to 2016.

Moreover, speaking to Congress on this issue in 2019, Fed Chair Jerome Powell warned against a return to the gold standard.

“You’ve assigned us the job of two direct, real economy objectives: maximum employment, stable prices. If you assigned us (to) stabilize the dollar price of gold, monetary policy could do that, but the other things would fluctuate, and we wouldn’t care,” Powell said. “There have been plenty of times in fairly recent history where the price of gold has sent a signal that would be quite negative for either of those goals.”

As can be seen, returning to the gold standard would be a complex ordeal with pros and cons. The likelihood of the US bringing back the gold standard is slim, but no doubt the question will continue to be up for debate under future presidents.

This is an updated version of an article first published by the Investing News Network in 2017.

Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates!

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.