Alfa Marushima Tokyo Japan

alfa-marushima-tokyo-japan

Grande Portage Announces Outstanding Results from Sensor-Based Ore Sorting Testwork, with Gold Grade of Sample Increased by 120%

Grande Portage Resources Ltd. (TSXV:GPG)(OTCQB:GPTRF)(FSE:GPB) (“Grande Portage” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce results from testwork of a sensor-based ore sorting system, utilizing a composite core sample from the New Amalga Mine Project located approximately 16 miles (25 km) northwest of the city of Juneau.

Summary of Results:

Unsorted Feed

Sorter Reject

Sorted Product

Mass (kg)

64.8 kg

37.2 kg

27.6 kg

% Mass Distribution

100%

57%

43%

Gold Grade (g/t)

5.9 g/t

0.6 g/t

12.9 g/t

% Gold Distribution

100%

6%

94%

Ian Klassen, President and CEO comments: “We are extremely pleased with the results of the testwork with the Steinert ore sorting equipment, which demonstrated excellent ability to identify and reject the unmineralized particles within the sample of New Amalga material, resulting in a 120% increase in gold grade and a 57% reduction in mass with very minimal gold loss.”

Mr. Klassen continued: “These results are game changing for a host of reasons. Integrating ore sorting into the conceptual mine production plan significantly reduces the amount of mined rock requiring transportation and processing at a third-party facility, lowering per-ounce costs and also providing useful sorter-reject material for underground backfill, all without the use of chemical processing reagents. This further enhances the existing advantages of our proposed direct-ship mine configuration which utilizes offsite processing. As demonstrated by the test results, it may also create opportunities for inclusion of thinner veins into the mine plan – areas of the deposit which otherwise may not have been considered viable.”

Background:

As previously announced, the Company’s Conceptual Mining Plan envisions the future development of the New Amalga gold mine as a selective underground mining operation which would send ore off-site to be processed at a third-party facility, enabled by the project’s location near tidewater and less than 4 miles (6.5km) from existing paved highway (Fig. 4). This results in a dramatically reduced mine site footprint due to the avoidance of chemical processing and tailings storage facilities.

The purpose of ore sorting is to quickly separate particles of waste dilution rock from the mined material, without the use of chemical reagents. The goal is to significantly reduce the volume of material that would be transported off-site to a third-party processing facility.

Grande Portage assembled a drill core composite which included both ore and waste material to reflect the dilution from wall rock (waste) which is inherent with underground blasting of narrow ore veins. The core composite was subjected to a sensor-based ore sorting test process at the facilities of Steinert US Inc, a leading global manufacturer of ore-sorting equipment.

Technical Description of Ore Sorting Test Process:

Sensor-based ore sorting can utilize a variety of measurements to determine whether a particle is ore or waste, including color, electromagnetic induction, laser, and x-ray analysis to assess elemental composition. The crushed rock is placed on a conveyor belt and then passed in front of the sensor, which rapidly analyzes the individual pieces of rock. When a piece of rock is identified as waste, a puff of compressed air redirects it to a “reject” bin. The remining pieces of rock are sent to the accepted “product” stockpile. (Fig. 2)

Fine particles too small to effectively sort are typically combined with the “product” stockpile, since higher-grade material tends to produce more fines during blasting and crushing due to the higher sulphide content and brittle nature of the quartz vein rock.

For the testwork, a series of reference samples were analyzed by the sorter machine, reflecting core material of various categories including “high grade ore”, “mid grade ore”, “low grade ore”, and “waste”. This allowed the sorter to learn the characteristics of each type of material in order to generate a sorting algorithm. Each of these reference samples were sourced from multiple drill holes at various locations within the deposit in order to capture any spatial variability in the rock characteristics.

After the sorting algorithm was developed, the composite sample was fed into the sorter machine (Fig. 3). This composite was sourced from multiple drill holes in various areas of the deposit distinct from the reference samples. It included approximately 55% wall rock and 45% vein rock, reflecting potential waste dilution within run-of-mine material to simulate mining an area of vein narrower than the minimum mechanized mining width.

In addition to the “product” material, three splits of “reject” material were generated from sorting the sample at progressively increasing level of selectivity, reflecting operation of the machine at various degrees of sorting criteria. All material was then assayed at SGS-Lakefield.

All three “reject” splits returned assays below the level which would be considered viable to transport and process at a third-party facility, and were therefore classified as waste, indicating that the highest level of sorter selectivity is appropriate. In total the sorter rejected 57% of the feed material, indicating excellent alignment with the approximately 55% wall rock content of the composite sample.

Additionally, all material was screened before assay to collect unsortable fines (<1cm), which were assayed separately. This confirmed that the fines contained a high degree of gold mineralization and are appropriate to combine with the “product” sample. A full table of results is shown below (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Table of Assay Results

Reject

#1

Reject

#2

Reject

#3

Sorted Product

Unsortable Fines

Mass (kg)

12.2

13.1

11.9

22.6

5.0

Au (g/t)

0.48

1.09

0.30

12.9

13.1

Overall Waste Rejected

Overall Product

Mass (kg)

37.2

27.6

Au (g/t)

0.64

12.94

Fig. 2: Simplified Conceptual Diagram of an Ore Sorting System

Fig. 3: Image of Ore Sorting Testwork Being Conducted on New Amalga Samples

A short video of the testwork process is available on YouTube at https://youtu.be/K4XzoRbjCXA

Fig. 4: Location of New Amalga Mine Project

Kyle Mehalek, P.E.., is the QP within the meaning of NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical disclosure in this release. Mr. Mehalek is independent of Grande Portage within the meaning of NI 43-101.

About Grande Portage:

Grande Portage Resources Ltd. is a publicly traded mineral exploration company focused on advancing the New Amalga Mine project, the outgrowth of the Herbert Gold discovery situated approximately 25 km north of Juneau, Alaska. The Company holds a 100% interest in the New Amalga property. The New Amalga gold system is open to length and depth and is host to at least six main composite vein-fault structures that contain ribbon structure quartz-sulfide veins. The project lies prominently within the 160km long Juneau Gold Belt, which has produced over eight million ounces of gold.

The Company’s updated NI#43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) reported at a base case mineral resources cut-off grade of 2.5 grams per tonne gold (g/t Au) and consists of: an Indicated Resource of 1,438,500 ounces of gold at an average grade of 9.47 g/t Au (4,726,000 tonnes); and an Inferred Resource of 515,700 ounces of gold at an average grade of 8.85 g/t Au (1,813,000 tonnes), as well as an Indicated Resource of 891,600 ounces of silver at an average grade of 5.86 g/t Ag (4,726,000 tonnes); and an Inferred Resource of 390,600 ounces of silver at an average grade of 7.33 g/t silver (1,813,000 tonnes). The MRE was prepared by Dr. David R. Webb, Ph.D., P.Geol., P.Eng. (DRW Geological Consultants Ltd.) with an effective date of July 17, 2024.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

“Ian Klassen”
Ian M. Klassen
President & Chief Executive Officer
Tel: (604) 899-0106
Email: Ian@grandeportage.com

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release includes certain “forward-looking statements” under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements include estimates and statements that describe the Company’s future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. Forward-looking statements may be identified by such terms as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “estimates”, “may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, or “plan”. Since forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties as described in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulators. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law.

Please note that under National Instrument 43-101, the Company is required to disclose that it has not based any production decision on NI 43-101-compliant reserve estimates, preliminary economic assessments, or feasibility studies, and historically production decisions made without such reports have increased uncertainty and higher technical and economic risks of failure. These risks include, among others, areas that are analyzed in more detail in a feasibility study or preliminary economic assessment, such as the application of economic analysis to mineral resources, more detailed metallurgical and other specialized studies in areas such as mining and recovery methods, market analysis, and environmental, social, and community impacts. Any decision to place the New Amalga Mine into operation at levels intended by management, expand a mine, make other production-related decisions, or otherwise carry out mining and processing operations would be largely based on internal non-public Company data, and on reports based on exploration and mining work by the Company and by geologists and engineers engaged by the Company.

NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICE PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED UNDER THE POLICIES OF THE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS NEWS RELEASE

Click here to connect with Grande Portage Resources (TSXV:GPG,OTCQB:GPTRF,FSE:GPB) to receive an Investor Presentation

Source

Lahontan Announces Private Placement of Units

Lahontan Gold Corp. (TSXV: LG) (OTCQB: LGCXF) (the “Company” or “Lahontan”) is pleased to announce a non-brokered private placement financing for gross proceeds of up to $2,000,000 through the issuance of up to 40,000,000 units (the “Units”) at a price of $0.05 per Unit (the “Offering”).

Each Unit is comprised of one common share of the Company (each, a “Common Share“) and one-half of one whole Common Share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a “Warrant“) of the Company. Each Warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one Common Share at a price of $0.08 per Common Share for a period of two (2) years from the date of issuance, provided, however, that should the closing price at which the Common Shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange (or any such other stock exchange in Canada as the Common Shares may trade at the applicable time) exceed CDN$0.12 for ten (10) consecutive trading days at any time following the date that is four months and one day after the date of issuance, the Company may accelerate the Warrant Term (the “Reduced Warrant Term“) such that the Warrants shall expire on the date which is 30 business days following the date a press release is issued by the Company announcing the Reduced Warrant Term

Gross proceeds raised from the Offering will be used for general working capital purposes and for exploration at the Company’s Santa Fe Mine Project.

Closing of the Offering is subject to receipt of all necessary corporate and regulatory approvals, including the approval of TSX Venture Exchange. All securities issued in connection with the Offering will be subject to a hold period of four months plus a day from the date of issuance and the resale rules of applicable securities legislation.

This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the securities in the United States. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”) or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. Persons as defined under applicable United States securities laws unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available.

About Lahontan Gold Corp.

Lahontan Gold Corp. is a Canadian mine development and mineral exploration company that holds, through its US subsidiaries, four top-tier gold and silver exploration properties in the Walker Lane of mining friendly Nevada. Lahontan’s flagship property, the 26.4 km2 Santa Fe Mine project, had past production of 359,202 ounces of gold and 702,067ounces of silver between 1988 and 1995 from open pit mines utilizing heap-leach processing*. The Santa Fe Mine has a Canadian National Instrument 43-101 compliant Indicated Mineral Resource of 1,539,000 oz Au Eq (grading 0.99 g/t Au Eq) and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 411,000 oz Au Eq (grading 0.76 g/t Au Eq), all pit constrained (Au Eq is inclusive of recovery, please see Santa Fe Project Technical Report*). The Company plans to continue advancing the Santa Fe Mine project towards production, update the Santa Fe Preliminary Economic Assessment, and drill test its satellite West Santa Fe project during 2025. For more information, please visit our website: www.lahontangoldcorp.com.

* Please see the “Preliminary Economic Assessment, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Santa Fe Project”, Authors: Kenji Umeno, P. Eng., Thomas Dyer, PE, Kyle Murphy, PE, Trevor Rabb, P. Geo, Darcy Baker, PhD, P. Geo., and John M. Young, SME-RM; Effective Date: December 10, 2024, Report Date: January 24, 2025. The Technical Report is available on the Company’s website and SEDAR+.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

Kimberly Ann

Founder, CEO, President, and Director

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:

Lahontan Gold Corp.

Kimberly Ann
Founder, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director
Phone: 1-530-414-4400

Email: Kimberly.ann@lahontangoldcorp.com

Website: www.lahontangoldcorp.com

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates at the date the statements are made and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to delays or uncertainties with regulatory approvals, including that of the TSXV. There are uncertainties inherent in forward-looking information, including factors beyond the Company’s control. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information if circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions should change except as required by law. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties that could affect financial results is contained in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulators, which filings are available at www.sedarplus.ca.

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/247764

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

Sun Summit Files NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Inaugural Mineral Resource Estimate on the Buck Project, Central B.C.

Sun Summit Minerals Corp. (TSXV: SMN) (OTCQB: SMREF) (“Sun Summit” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce that it has filed an independent technical report (the “Technical Report”) with a mineral resource estimate (MRE) as described more fully in the Technical Report and the Company’s news release dated February 26, 2025.

The Technical Report titled “2025 Mineral Resource Estimate for the Buck Main Deposit NI 43-101 Technical Report”, dated April 2, 2025 (effective date of January 28, 2025), has been prepared by Moose Mountain Technical Services, and is available on the Company’s Website (https://sunsummitminerals.com/investors/presentations-downloads/) and on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) under Sun Summit’s issuer profile.

Highlights:

  • Inferred Mineral Resources at Buck Main are estimated to include 820,400 oz AuEq1 (775,500 oz gold and 8,435,000 oz silver) at a grade of 0.489 g/t AuEq1 (0.462 g/t Au, 5.0 g/t Ag) contained within 52.2 Mt.
  • Indicated Mineral Resources at Buck Main are estimated to include 19,100 gold equivalent ounces1 (oz AuEq) (18,300 oz gold and 158,000 oz silver) at a grade of 0.519 g/t gold equivalent1 (g/t AuEq) (0.496 g/t Au, 4.3 g/t Ag) contained within 1.15 million tonnes (Mt).
  • The near-surface Mineral Resource at Buck Main is constrained within an optimized open-pit shell using a 0.25 g/t AuEq cutoff, ensuring reasonable prospects for economic extraction.
  • Additional upside at Buck Main as the deposit remains open for expansion in most directions and at depth.
  • Effective discovery with average drill costs of CAD $18 per ounce of AuEq included in the MRE.

Notes:

1. Gold Equivalent (AuEq) grade is based on AuEq = Au + 0.0053*Ag (see notes to Table 1 below)

The Buck MRE is centered on the Buck Main deposit, 12 km south of Houston, BC. The road accessible deposit comprises a broad, 800 metre striking zone of intermediate-sulfidation epithermal-related gold-silver mineralization hosted in intermediate to felsic volcanics and intrusions. The MRE is based on 42,440 metres of drilling in 161 holes, of which 34,386 metres in 98 holes were completed by Sun Summit between 2020 and 2023 (Figures 1 and 2, Table 3).

Buck Main Mineral Resource Estimate

Table 1. Summary of Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources for the Buck Main deposit

Class AuEq
Cutoff
In Situ Tonnage and Grade AuEq
Metal
Au
Metal
Ag
Metal

Tonnage AuEq Au Ag NSR
(gpt) (ktonnes) (gpt) (gpt) (gpt) ($CDN) (kOz) (kOz) (kOz)
Indicated 0.25 1,148 0.519 0.496 4.3 40.40 19.1 18.3 158
Inferred 0.25 52,224 0.489 0.462 5.0 38.04 820.4 775.5 8,435

Notes to the 2025 Resource Table:

  1. Resources are reported using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards and were estimated using the 2019 CIM Best Practices Guidelines, as required National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”)
  2. The base case Mineral Resource has been confined by “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” shape using the following assumptions:
    • Metal prices of US$2250/oz Gold, US$26/oz Silver
    • Metallurgical recovery of 79% Gold and 38% Silver
    • Payable metal of 95% Silver, 99% Gold in dore
    • Forex of 0.72 $US:$CDN
    • Offsite costs (transport, smelter treatment and refining) of CDN$8.50/oz Gold and CDN$0.25/oz Silver.
    • Processing Costs of CDN$12/tonne milled and General & Administrative (G&A) costs of CDN$ 2.50/ tonne milled
    • Mining cost of CDN$2.56 / tonne for mineralized material and CDN$2.50/tonne for waste
    • 45-degree pit slopes
    • The 120% price case pit shell is used for the confining shape

  3. The resulting net smelter return (NSR) for the purpose of the AuEq calculation = Au*CDN$98.60/g*79% recovery rate + Ag*CDN$1.08/g*38% recovery rate
  4. The resulting AuEq = Au + 0.0053*Ag
  5. Numbers may not add due to rounding
  6. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the estimated mineral resources will be converted into mineral reserves.

The Mineral Resources for the Buck Main deposit have been estimated using a 0.25 g/t AuEq cutoff determined using assumptions listed in the footnotes of Table 1. These assumptions satisfy the requirements of reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. Table 2 shows cutoff sensitivities at different grades.

Table 2. Buck Main deposit cutoff sensitivities

Class AuEq
Cutoff
(gpt)
In Situ Tonnage and Grade AuEq
Metal
(kOz)
Au
Metal
(kOz)
Ag
Metal
(kOz)
Tonnage
(ktonnes)
AuEq
(gpt)
Au
(gpt)
Ag
(gpt)
NSR
($CDN)
Indicated 0.2 1,604 0.435 0.414 3.9 33.85 22.4 21.3 203
0.25 1,148 0.519 0.496 4.3 40.40 19.1 18.3 158
0.3 852 0.605 0.580 4.6 47.09 16.6 15.9 126
0.35 645 0.695 0.669 5.0 54.12 14.4 13.9 103
0.4 494 0.793 0.765 5.4 61.76 12.6 12.1 85
0.5 317 0.989 0.957 6.0 76.99 10.1 9.8 61
1 91 1.783 1.743 7.5 138.87 5.2 5.1 22
Inferred 0.2 70,847 0.419 0.394 4.7 32.60 953.5 897.2 10,617
0.25 52,224 0.489 0.462 5.0 38.04 820.4 775.5 8,435
0.3 39,248 0.560 0.532 5.3 43.60 706.5 670.9 6,721
0.35 30,088 0.632 0.602 5.6 49.21 611.3 582.5 5,419
0.4 23,644 0.703 0.671 5.9 54.71 534.0 510.3 4,477
0.5 15,697 0.833 0.800 6.3 64.87 420.4 403.6 3,171
1 3,126 1.485 1.440 8.5 115.64 149.2 144.7 857

Table 3. Drill data used in the Mineral Resources Estimate

Year Total
Number of
DHs
Total
Depth
(m)
Length
Assayed
(m)
Total %
Assayed
(m)
Number of
DHs within
Domains
Assayed
Within
Modelled
Domains
(m)
% Assayed
within the
Domains
Total 161 42,440 39,737 94% 123 27,034 99%

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/6142/247455_b4b1af61746b7add_001.jpg

Figure 1: Buck Main Drilling and Resource Pit Outline

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/6142/247455_b4b1af61746b7add_001full.jpg

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/6142/247455_b4b1af61746b7add_002.jpg

Figure 2: Buck Main 3D View of Resource Constraining Pit showing AuEq blocks above 0.2 g/t

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/6142/247455_b4b1af61746b7add_002full.jpg

Discovery Metrics

Sun Summit has efficiently delineated the Buck Main deposit with a total drilling cost of approximately CAD$18 per AuEq ounce included in the MRE. Since 2020, the Company has completed 98 drill holes at Buck Main, totaling over 36,400 meters. The MRE was informed by assay results from 123 drill holes and 27,034 metres of assayed intervals. The Company incurred CAD $15 million in drilling expenditures since 2020.

The low discovery cost reflects the efficiency of Sun Summit’s exploration strategy, which included systematic targeting using advanced geological modeling, geophysical surveys, and geochemical analysis. This exploration success underscores the strong potential for further resource growth, as the deposit remains open in multiple directions.

Next Steps

  • Additional metallurgical testing will be initiated to optimize metal recoveries and evaluate potential byproduct elements, ensuring the economic viability of future mining operations.
  • Further drilling designed to investigate the extents of the Buck Main deposit is recommended. Areas open to the north, west, and east will be targeted in future drill programs.

National Instrument 43-101 Disclosure

The Buck Main MRE was prepared by Sue Bird, M.Sc., P.Eng., V.P. of Resources and Engineering at Moose Mountain Technical Services, an independent Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101. Darcy Baker, P.Geo, President of Equity Exploration Consultants Ltd, assisted in the preparation of the report and is the Qualified Person responsible for certain sections of the report. Sue Bird has reviewed and approved the technical information about the MRE in this news release.

Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability; however, a reasonable prospect of eventual economic extraction pit has been used to confine the Mineral Resource Estimate using parameters detailed in the table notes.

The QP for the Mineral Resource Estimate is not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the potential development of Mineral Resource Estimate. Factors that may affect the estimates include: metal price assumptions, changes in interpretations of mineralization geometry and continuity of mineralization zones, changes to kriging assumptions, metallurgical recovery assumptions, operating cost assumptions, confidence in the modifying factors, including assumptions that surface rights to allow mining infrastructure to be constructed will be forthcoming, delays or other issues in reaching agreements with local or regulatory authorities and stakeholders, and changes in land tenure requirements or in permitting requirement.

This news release has been reviewed and approved by Sun Summit’s Vice President Exploration, Ken MacDonald, P. Geo., a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators.

Upcoming Events

Sun Summit is pleased to announce its participation in two regional BC events. The Company will display drill core from the 2024 JD exploration program and drill core from the Buck Main zone from April 8-9 at the KEG 2025 Conference and Trade Show (https://www.keg.bc.ca/conference/default.htm), and, again at the Minerals North Conference (https://mineralsnorth.ca/) in Prince George, BC, from April 30 to May 2.

Community Engagement

Sun Summit is engaging with First Nations on whose territory our projects are located and is discussing their interests and identifying contract and work opportunities, as well as opportunities to support community initiatives. The Company looks forward to continuing to work with local and regional First Nations with ongoing exploration.

About the Buck Project

The Buck Project is situated in a historic mining district near Houston, B.C., with excellent nearby infrastructure that allows for year-round, road-accessible exploration.

The project is host to the Buck Main intermediate-sulfidation epithermal-related gold-silver-zinc system. Most of the mineralization drilled to date at Buck Main consists of long, continuous zones of disseminated and breccia-hosted, bulk tonnage-style gold-silver-zinc. Vein-hosted, high-grade mineralization has also been intersected near the center of Buck Main.

Exploration at the Buck Project is focused on investigating the lateral and vertical extent of gold-silver-zinc mineralization at the Buck Main system, and to define additional drill targets across the entire land package through systematic exploration programs.

About Sun Summit

Sun Summit (TSX-V: SMN; OTCQB: SMREF) is a mineral exploration company focused on expansion and discovery of district scale gold and copper assets in British Columbia. The Company’s diverse portfolio includes the JD Project in the Toodoggone region of north-central B.C., and the Buck Project in central B.C.

Further details are available at www.sunsummitminerals.com.

Link to Figures

Figure 1: https://wp-sunsummitminerals-2024.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/media/2025/02/Fig1_Buck_MRE_Feb2025-scaled.jpg

Figure 2: https://wp-sunsummitminerals-2024.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/media/2025/02/Fig2_Buck_MRE_Feb2025.jpg

On behalf of the board of directors

Niel Marotta
Chief Executive Officer & Director
info@sunsummitminerals.com

For further information, contact:

Matthew Benedetto, Simone Capital
mbenedetto@simonecapital.ca
Tel. 416-817-1226

Forward-Looking Information

Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements, which involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition, the forward-looking statements require management to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. There is significant risk that the forward-looking statements will not prove to be accurate, that the management’s assumptions may not be correct and that actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements. Generally forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “anticipate”, “will”, “expect”, “may”, “continue”, “could”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “plan”, “potential” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release may include, but are not limited to, estimates of mineral resources, potential mineralization, exploration plans, and engagement with First Nations communities. These forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect which, without limiting the generality of the following, include: risks inherent in exploration activities; the impact of exploration competition; unexpected geological or hydrological conditions; changes in government regulations and policies, including trade laws and policies; failure to obtain necessary permits and approvals from government authorities; volatility and sensitivity to market prices; volatility and sensitivity to capital market fluctuations; the ability to raise funds through private or public equity financings; environmental and safety risks including increased regulatory burdens; weather and other natural phenomena; and other exploration, development, operating, financial market and regulatory risks. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof or the dates specifically referenced in this press release, where applicable. Except as required by applicable securities laws and regulation, Sun Summit disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities laws. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Source

China Escalates Trade War with “Precision Strike” on US Rare Earths Access

In a move that could severely disrupt global supply chains, China announced on Friday (April 4) that it will implement tight export controls on seven critical rare earth elements.

According to Reuters, the rare earths affected by the new restrictions — samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium — are crucial for the production of everything from electric vehicles and smartphones to military systems like fighter jets, missiles and satellites.

China, which produces about 90 percent of the world’s rare earths, has long held a dominant position in global supply, and these latest controls could further destabilize already fragile international supply chains.


A “precision strike” on US defense capabilities

Mark A. Smith, CEO of NioCorp Developments (NASDAQ:NB), a company working to create domestic supply of critical minerals in the US, called China’s actions a “precision strike” against the Pentagon’s supply chains.

In a press release, he emphasized the far-reaching impact of rare earths export curbs on US defense technologies.

“This is a precision strike by China against Pentagon supply chains that enable our most powerful weapons and defense systems,” Smith said on Friday. “These aren’t just metals — they’re bottleneck elements, and without them, much of the Pentagon’s advanced hardware risks slipping from superiority to obsolescence.”

The rare earth elements targeted by China are not just vital for defense, but are integral to other industries too. From renewable energy technologies to high-end electronics, the list of affected products is extensive.

NioCorp began to explore the possibility of recycling rare earths last year, alongside the feasibility of recycling post-consumer rare earth magnets to reduce reliance on Chinese imports.

As the US military continues to modernize its technology, including hypersonic weapons and advanced satellite systems, the lack of access to these elements could have long-term supply implications.

This latest round of trade tensions comes in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff policies and the imposition of a 54 percent tariff on Chinese imports. In March, Trump invoked wartime powers under the Defense Production Act to address the nation’s reliance on foreign critical minerals.

The US Department of Defense has already been involved in efforts to develop domestic rare earths production capabilities, and this move from China may serve to accelerate those initiatives.

China has increasingly wielded its dominance over critical materials as a weapon in trade war situations with the US in the past few years. Most recently, the country implemented similar curbs on minerals like gallium, germanium and graphite — all of which are key to high-tech and defense applications.

While the recent export restrictions will not result in an outright ban, they will subject shipments to greater scrutiny, with controls targeting exports of materials used in both civilian and military applications.

Growing calls for domestic production

The potential economic fallout from China’s restrictions is substantial. Its dominant role in the global rare earths market means that the US and its allies have few alternatives when it comes to sourcing these materials.

Ucore Rare Metals (TSXV:UCU,OTCQX:UURAF), a company focused on developing North American rare earths processing facilities, has stressed the need to establish a more independent and resilient supply chain.

Pat Ryan, CEO of Ucore, which is developing its proprietary RapidSX rare earths refining technology, acknowledged the urgency of addressing these vulnerabilities.

“China’s recent announcement highlights the urgent need for a robust and independent rare earth supply chain in North America,” Ryan maintained in a Friday press release.

“Ucore’s RapidSX technology offers a transformative solution to this challenge, and we are committed to advancing our strategic initiatives to ensure a stable and secure supply of critical rare earth elements.”

Ucore has secured key funding for its initiatives, including a US$4.28 million deal with the Canadian government to demonstrate the commercial viability of its technology, and a US$4 million contract with the US Department of Defense.

The company is also working to develop a rare earths processing facility in Louisiana, which could significantly reduce North America’s reliance on foreign sources.

Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates!

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.